
Why Secure Estates Still Matter for Modern Living
Secure estates continue to appeal to homeowners and businesses because they combine controlled access, strong safeguards, and a more predictable environment for day-to-day life.
Read moreA practical report from an Onguard OG-66 training session at a working security site, covering radio setup, patrol verification, alerts, GPS, control-room response and reporting.

Security technology is easiest to understand when it is demonstrated in the environment where it will actually be used. That was the purpose of an Onguard system onboarding and live demonstration held at the Bidvest Fidelity Vissershok site.
The session was led by Robby, an Onguard trainer. It covered two TYT OG-66 radios, 17 NFC patrol points, the monitoring dashboard, control-room procedures, patrol scheduling, push-to-talk communication, GPS tracking and automated reporting.
This report explains what was demonstrated and what the session teaches about implementing a connected security patrol system successfully.
The session had three practical goals:
The approach was deliberately operational. Instead of treating the OG-66 as only a radio, the demonstration showed how communication, guard safety, patrol accountability and control-room decisions connect in one workflow.
Two TYT OG-66 radios were available: one for the control room and one for the site patrol. Seventeen NFC points were provided for installation around the site.
The radio uses a secured SIM card inside the battery compartment and must be used with its antenna attached. Removing the antenna can make network connectivity unreliable. A full battery generally supports a working shift, with performance depending on usage and network conditions. The recommended practice is to keep radios on charging cradles in the guard hut between patrols.
The NFC points are scanned by touching the back of the radio to the tag. A short sound confirms a successful scan. The points do not display their location, so each one must be given a meaningful name in the system, such as “Front Gateâ€, “Warehouse†or “Perimeterâ€. NFC points should not be mounted directly on metal; a wooden spacer can be used where necessary.
The monitoring dashboard gives controllers a current view of the security operation. It shows outstanding alerts, sites, devices and online or offline status.
Selecting a device opens more detail, including:
An offline status is intentionally delayed for several minutes so that a brief signal interruption does not create a false alarm. This is an important operational lesson: monitoring systems need sensible thresholds, not just maximum sensitivity.
During the demonstration, alert management was taught as a five-step process:
The controller selects Process to stop the audible alarm and open the alert details.
The controller checks the alert type, device location and recent activity. Possible causes include a panic activation, missed patrol, patrol not started or device offline condition.
The controller contacts the guard by radio or phone. If more time is needed, the alert can be placed on hold with an explanatory note.
The controller records what was found and what action was taken. Notes are timestamped and linked to the logged-in user, then included in reporting.
Once the situation is resolved, the controller adds the final note and selects Complete.
This process matters because an alert is not a complete incident record on its own. The investigation and response must be recorded as well. Alerts left on hold for too long can escalate to management, while empty notes leave no useful explanation for later review.
Patrol verification begins with correctly naming and positioning the NFC points. Points are then grouped into routes and assigned to schedules.
When a guard scans a point, the system records:
This creates objective evidence of patrol activity. It is more useful than relying only on a radio call in which a guard says a patrol was completed.
The training also highlighted the importance of realistic timing. Inter-point delays must allow enough time to walk between checkpoints. Robby recommended walking the route with a stopwatch before setting the delays. If timings are too short, guards can receive “arrived too early†errors and fail a patrol despite moving correctly.
The Patrol Not Started alert was presented as a particularly useful control-room feature because it gives the controller an opportunity to contact a guard before the patrol becomes a complete failure.
GPS and NFC answer different questions.
GPS shows approximate movement and can help confirm that a radio remained on site, left a designated area or travelled through a broad patrol zone. It is not precise enough to prove that a person reached a particular doorway or checkpoint, and normal GPS drift can be several metres.
NFC scanning provides the more specific checkpoint record. The most reliable approach is therefore to use GPS for wider movement context and NFC for proof of a particular patrol point.
The session also covered geofencing. A broad boundary is recommended because an overly tight boundary can create false alerts when GPS drifts. Geofencing should be enabled after the site boundary has been tested rather than during the earliest setup stage.
A concealed NFC duress point can be installed in a discreet location, such as inside a vehicle or beneath a desk. A guard under threat can scan the point with the radio in a way that appears natural, generating a panic alert for the control room.
The placement must be decided carefully by site management and kept confidential. A duress function is only useful when guards can activate it safely and controllers know how to respond.
The two radios used during the session were assigned to the same channel, allowing the site team to communicate. Onguard can also create groups for all guards, supervisors, management or individual sites.
A control-room base station can monitor multiple groups and communicate with a particular radio or an entire site. Controllers can also broadcast a message to one radio or all radios. The radio announces the message audibly, and each broadcast is logged with its time, sender and content.
This is useful for practical instructions such as weather warnings, equipment reminders, access changes or a lookout notice. Logging broadcasts adds accountability to urgent communication.
The automated report covers the previous 24-hour period and can include:
The report is dynamic, so information received after a device reconnects can update historic activity. Detailed records should be saved regularly when information must be retained beyond the platform’s detailed retention period. Simplified client-facing reports can show patrol completion and attendance without exposing internal operational detail.
The strongest lesson was to introduce the system in phases rather than activate every feature on the first day.
The recommended sequence was:
Early patrol efficiency may be low while guards learn new routines. That is expected. Clear point names, realistic schedules, individual user accounts and consistent controller follow-up are more important than trying to configure everything at once.
The session also showed why standby devices, charging procedures and support contacts should be planned before deployment. Good implementation is not only about the hardware; it is about the habits and decisions around the hardware.
The Vissershok training session shows that a connected PTT radio can support much more than voice communication. When configured properly, the same operational system can help a security company:
The technology does not replace supervision or training. It gives supervisors and controllers better information with which to perform those responsibilities.
An Onguard session typically covers radio hardware, NFC checkpoint scanning, user roles, monitoring, alert response, patrol scheduling, push-to-talk groups, GPS, duress procedures and automated reports. The system is demonstrated in the operating environment so settings can be tested against real routes and responsibilities.
The guard touches the back of the OG-66 to NFC points installed at named checkpoints. The system records the point, radio, date and time, then compares the scan with the scheduled route.
No. GPS provides approximate movement context. NFC checkpoint scans are better evidence that a guard reached a specific location.
The controller should acknowledge the alert, investigate the cause, contact the guard or take other action, document the response and complete the alert when resolved.
Learning time varies by site and team. A phased rollout gives guards time to become comfortable with PTT communication before scheduled patrol requirements are added.
The Onguard training and demonstration at Vissershok showed how a security radio, NFC checkpoints and monitoring software become useful when they are connected to clear procedures.
The most important outcome was not simply learning where to click. It was learning how to turn a radio call, a patrol scan or an alert into a documented operational decision.
For security companies considering a PTT and patrol-monitoring system, an on-site demonstration is a practical way to test coverage, routes, alert rules and training requirements before wider rollout.
Keep reading
Explore more security insights and industry news from the Onguard team.

Secure estates continue to appeal to homeowners and businesses because they combine controlled access, strong safeguards, and a more predictable environment for day-to-day life.
Read more
Security operations rely on people making quick and accurate decisions every day. From controlling access points to recording visitor details and monitoring patrols, even small mistakes can create serious risks. Human error has always been one of the biggest challenges in the security industry, but modern technology is helping reduce these risks significantly.
Read more
Security has become a major priority for estates, businesses, office parks, and residential communities across South Africa. While protecting people and property remains the primary goal, compliance is now just as important. Failing to follow the correct security and data handling procedures can expose organisations to serious legal, operational, and reputational risks. One of the
Read more